From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] kvm: fix refcounting race release vs. module unload
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:49:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49295F6D.8010200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811202010.00125.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> The problem is that kvm_destroy_vm can run while the module count
> is 0. That means, you can remove the module while kvm_destroy_vm
> is running. But kvm_destroy_vm is part of the module text. This
> causes a kerneloops. The race exists without the msleep but is much
> harder to trigger.
>
> Nevertheless, the right solution is to call kvm_destroy_vm only
> with module_ref_count > 0. This can be done by calling kvm_destroy_vm
> only via a release function, since the VFS will not allow module unload.
> This patch sets kvm_vcpu_fops.owner to the module and manually
> increases the module refcount after anon_inode_getfd, since
> anon_inode_getfd does not do it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: kvm/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ kvm/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_release(struct inode
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct file_operations kvm_vcpu_fops = {
> +static struct file_operations kvm_vcpu_fops = {
> .release = kvm_vcpu_release,
> .unlocked_ioctl = kvm_vcpu_ioctl,
> .compat_ioctl = kvm_vcpu_ioctl,
> @@ -1318,6 +1318,7 @@ static int create_vcpu_fd(struct kvm_vcp
> int fd = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-vcpu", &kvm_vcpu_fops, vcpu, 0);
> if (fd < 0)
> kvm_put_kvm(vcpu->kvm);
> + __module_get(kvm_vcpu_fops.owner);
> return fd;
> }
>
> @@ -2061,6 +2062,7 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned int
> }
>
> kvm_chardev_ops.owner = module;
> + kvm_vcpu_fops.owner = module;
>
> r = misc_register(&kvm_dev);
> if (r) {
>
Messing with module counts is slightly ugly. How about having a vm fd
fget() the /dev/kvm fd() instead?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-23 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 19:10 [PATCH/RFC] kvm: fix refcounting race release vs. module unload Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-23 13:49 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-11-24 9:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-25 8:07 ` [PATCH/RFC 2] kvm: fix module refcount issues with anon_inodegetfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-25 13:55 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-27 14:01 ` [PATCH/Request for review]: check for fops->owner in anon_inode_getfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-27 18:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-27 19:17 ` [PATCH v2]: " Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-27 19:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-12-01 8:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49295F6D.8010200@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).