kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: New guest debug interface
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:48:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <493F8268.2040903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493D3A8E.1080101@siemens.com>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> btw, is it possible to emulate the old interface on top of the new
>> implementation?  I feel unconfortable with dropping an interface (albeit
>> an unused one) without even a warning.
>>     
>
> Would be possible, I guess - but do we really have to care? It only
> worked for VMX, only on UP, qemu has no support for it (I'm planning to
> submit the new interface once it's merged and settled), and I don't
> think many people actually touched the old one so far. And those who may
> throw the old IOCTL at a new kernel will get a proper error on return.
> Is this problematic?
>   

No, just exploring our options.  I'm okay with dropping the old 
implementation.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-10  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-27 11:43 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Improved guest debugging / debug register emulation Jan Kiszka
2008-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] VMX: Support for injecting software exceptions Jan Kiszka
2008-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: New guest debug interface Jan Kiszka
2008-12-07  9:55   ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-08  9:13     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-08  9:34       ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-08  9:42         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-08 13:47         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-08 14:57           ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-08 15:17             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-10  8:48               ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: Virtualize debug registers Jan Kiszka
2008-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: VMX: Ensure interruptibility when single-stepping Jan Kiszka
2008-12-07 10:05   ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-08  9:17     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-12-11 19:15     ` [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Allow single-stepping when interruptible Jan Kiszka
2008-11-27 11:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: Wire-up hardware breakpoints for guest debugging Jan Kiszka
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-06  9:15 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Fix and improve guest debugging and x86 debug registers Jan Kiszka
2008-10-06  9:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: New guest debug interface Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=493F8268.2040903@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).