From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 5] fix cpu_physical_memory len
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:06:56 -0600
Message-ID: <4942B650.20609@codemonkey.ws>
References: <5d932ac0ac8940b042c1.1229105803@duo.random>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]:45274 "EHLO
	an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751214AbYLLTHC (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:07:02 -0500
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so737469and.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:07:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5d932ac0ac8940b042c1.1229105803@duo.random>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>
> Be consistent and have length be size_t for all methods.
>   

ram_addr_t would be better than size_t here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori