From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: handle singlestep during emulation
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:30:31 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494454351.7440476.1375266631241.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731094649.GE7484@redhat.com>
----- Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:11:36PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > This lets debugging work better during emulation of invalid
> > guest state.
> >
> > This time the check is done after emulation, but before writeback
> > of the flags; we need to check the flags *before* execution of the
> > instruction, we cannot check singlestep_rip because the CS base may
> > have already been modified.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 1368cf5..9805cfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -4971,6 +4971,41 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_check_hw_bp(unsigned long addr, u32 type, u32 dr7,
> > return dr6;
> > }
> >
> > +static void kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *r)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Use the "raw" value to see if TF was passed to the processor.
> > + * Note that the new value of the flags has not been saved yet.
> > + *
> > + * This is correct even for TF set by the guest, because "the
> > + * processor will not generate this exception after the instruction
> > + * that sets the TF flag".
> > + */
> > + unsigned long rflags = kvm_x86_ops->get_rflags(vcpu);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(rflags & X86_EFLAGS_TF)) {
> > + if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP) {
> > + kvm_run->debug.arch.dr6 = DR6_BS | DR6_FIXED_1;
> > + kvm_run->debug.arch.pc = vcpu->arch.singlestep_rip;
> > + kvm_run->debug.arch.exception = DB_VECTOR;
> > + kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> > + *r = EMULATE_USER_EXIT;
> > + } else {
> > + vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
> > + /*
> > + * "Certain debug exceptions may clear bit 0-3. The
> > + * remaining contents of the DR6 register are never
> > + * cleared by the processor".
> > + */
> > + vcpu->arch.dr6 &= ~15;
> > + vcpu->arch.dr6 |= DR6_BS;
> > + kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, DB_VECTOR);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool kvm_vcpu_check_breakpoint(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *r)
> > {
> > struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
> > @@ -5117,10 +5152,12 @@ restart:
> >
> > if (writeback) {
> > toggle_interruptibility(vcpu, ctxt->interruptibility);
> > - kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
> > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> > vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_to_vcpu = false;
> > kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
> > + if (r == EMULATE_DONE)
> Single step will not work for mmio write and pio out, we never return
> into emulator for those instructions.
Ok to apply the patch as is and work it out later (I suppose I need to
check for NULL complete_userspace_io, and if so set my function)? It
is already a huge improvement in usability.
Paolo
> > + kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep(vcpu, &r);
> > + kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
> > } else
> > vcpu->arch.emulate_regs_need_sync_to_vcpu = true;
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
>
> --
> Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 15:11 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: minimal debugging support during emulation Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: rename EMULATE_DO_MMIO Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31 9:40 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: handle hardware breakpoints during emulation Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31 10:00 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: handle singlestep " Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31 9:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 10:30 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-07-31 10:40 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494454351.7440476.1375266631241.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox