From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Vmchannel PCI device. Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:20:53 +0200 Message-ID: <49462175.7020107@redhat.com> References: <20081214115027.4028.56164.stgit@dhcp-1-237.tlv.redhat.com> <20081214131247.GS5555@redhat.com> <49455B5E.8080504@codemonkey.ws> <20081214193735.GA7215@redhat.com> <49458E24.5090609@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50153 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752018AbYLOJU7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:20:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49458E24.5090609@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori wrote: > > vmchannel was developed for SPICE, is this not right? No, spice does its own thing. It's dma intensive, so it isn't a good fit for vmchannel. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function