From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: work around inability of older kvm modules to destroy memory regions Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:19:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4948FC6F.3070208@redhat.com> References: <20081209161057.DC28A25006D@cleopatra.tlv.redhat.com> <493FCD5A.7010308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4948EFEC.2020407@redhat.com> <4948FA08.8010505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm , Hollis Blanchard , Carsten Otte , Christian Borntraeger To: Christian Ehrhardt Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47114 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750934AbYLQNU0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:20:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4948FA08.8010505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: >> >> Your band aid should be fine. Yes, it's ugly, but this will be in >> flux as we merge with upstream qemu. Please resend it with a signoff. >> > still ugly, but in a proper patch style now :-) > > Applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function