From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] for_each_shadow_entry Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:00:00 +0200 Message-ID: <49574010.8090008@redhat.com> References: <1230211419-2389-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <20081227232519.GA4114@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55103 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752497AbYL1JAF (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:00:05 -0500 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBS902TK003472 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:00:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081227232519.GA4114@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 03:23:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> This patchset replaces walk_shadow(), which calls a callback for each >> shadow pte that maps a guest virtal address, by an equivalent for_each style >> construct. Benefits are less thunks and smaller code. >> >> Please review. >> > > Looks good. > Merged; thanks for the review. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function