public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@intel.com>
Cc: "Liu, Kechao" <kechao.liu@intel.com>,
	"'kvm@vger.kernel.org'" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] kvm-userspace: Load PCI option ROMs
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:28:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <495B3B43.2090200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61563CE63B4F854986A895DA7AD3C177044E7098@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Shan, Haitao wrote:
> Hi, Avi,
>
> Option ROM already has its own BAR at 0x30h. I think the devices assignment code now already handles this register.
>   

Okay good.

> Can I summary your proposals like the following: In guest BIOS, scan all the pci devices (virtual) for existance of Option ROMs. Copy them to available BIOS space in 0xC0000 - 0xDFFFF. Execute the ROM code at copied location.
>   

Yes.

> I don't understand why this makes differences compared to scanning and copying Option ROMs in QEMU, 

If the ROM BAR is already handled (including registering the memory when 
the BAR is programmed -- I don't see that in the code), then there is no 
big advantage.  It's closer to how real hardware works, but that's about it.

> especially given that the VGA BIOS and etherboot ROM are also copied to BIOS space in QEMU before they execute in rom_scan loop in guest BIOS.
>   

The VGA BIOS is typically present on the motherboard itself, at least on 
some configurations.  You're right about etherboot.

I'll apply the patch.  Can you take a look at the ROM BAR?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-31  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-29  3:51 [PATCH][v2] kvm-userspace: Load PCI option ROMs Liu, Kechao
2008-12-29  8:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-29  9:36   ` Liu, Kechao
2008-12-29  9:49     ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-30  1:01       ` Shan, Haitao
2008-12-30 15:51         ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-31  2:06           ` Shan, Haitao
2008-12-31  9:28             ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-03  2:29               ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04  2:12               ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04  3:54                 ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04  4:58                   ` Shan, Haitao
2009-01-04 10:26                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:12                     ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04 17:28                       ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:29                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 17:54                         ` Leendert van Doorn
2009-01-04 19:51                           ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-04 18:03                         ` Kevin O'Connor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=495B3B43.2090200@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
    --cc=kechao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox