From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] kvm-userspace: Load PCI option ROMs Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:29:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4960F209.1000505@redhat.com> References: <49588A4A.8020902@redhat.com> <49589D21.9070201@redhat.com> <61563CE63B4F854986A895DA7AD3C177044E6ECA@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <495A4367.6050203@redhat.com> <61563CE63B4F854986A895DA7AD3C177044E7098@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <495B3B43.2090200@redhat.com> <61563CE63B4F854986A895DA7AD3C177044E7306@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <00e301c96e20$35c2fdb0$a148f910$@org> <49608EBC.2090409@redhat.com> <010101c96e8f$a42d4a20$ec87de60$@org> <4960F1D2.4080600@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Shan, Haitao'" , "'Liu, Kechao'" , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Leendert van Doorn , "Kevin O'Connor" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35894 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759261AbZADR3s (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:29:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4960F1D2.4080600@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > > Surely, the BIOS call interface is a GPL boundary, just like the Linux > syscall interface. Kevin, is that not the case? If it is a GPL > interface, can you add an explicit exception to make it clear? s/GPL interface/GPL boundary/. Must be clear on this lawyer talk. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function