From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
joerg.roedel@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:29:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49636AE7.4090108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106141151.GA3701@amt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:41:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Don't allow a vcpu with cr4.pge cleared to use a shadow page created with
>>>> cr4.pge set; this might cause a cr3 switch not to sync ptes that have the
>>>> global bit set (the global bit has no effect if !cr4.pge).
>>>>
>>>> This can only occur on smp with different cr4.pge settings for different
>>>> vcpus (since a cr4 change will resync the shadow ptes), but there's no
>>>> cost to being correct here.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> index f49bfd0..ab8ef1d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>>> @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ union kvm_mmu_page_role {
>>>> unsigned metaphysical:1;
>>>> unsigned access:3;
>>>> unsigned invalid:1;
>>>> + unsigned cr4_pge:1;
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> index c4da7fb..aa4575c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ void kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
>>>> }
>>>> kvm_x86_ops->set_cr4(vcpu, cr4);
>>>> vcpu->arch.cr4 = cr4;
>>>> + vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role.cr4_pge = !!(cr4 & X86_CR4_PGE);
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This line broke VMware ESX bootup using NPT on one VCPU for me. If I
>>> comment it out and apply my patches to actually make ESX run, it boots
>>> again.
>>>
>>>
>> I think this might be the problem:
>>
>>
>>> static int mmu_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
>>> bool can_unsync)
>>> {
>>> struct kvm_mmu_page *shadow;
>>>
>>> shadow = kvm_mmu_lookup_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
>>> if (shadow) {
>>> if (shadow->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
>>> return 1;
>>> if (shadow->unsync)
>>> return 0;
>>> if (can_unsync && oos_shadow)
>>> return kvm_unsync_page(vcpu, shadow);
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>> lookup_page() is not deterministic if there are multiple shadows for a
>> page, and the patch increases multiple shadows.
>>
>> Marcelo, shouldn't there be a for_each in there?
>>
>
> static int kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp) {
>
> unsigned index;
> struct hlist_head *bucket;
> struct kvm_mmu_page *s;
> struct hlist_node *node, *n;
>
> index = kvm_page_table_hashfn(sp->gfn);
> bucket = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[index];
> /* don't unsync if pagetable is shadowed with multiple roles */
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(s, node, n, bucket, hash_link) {
> if (s->gfn != sp->gfn || s->role.metaphysical)
> continue;
> if (s->role.word != sp->role.word)
> return 1;
> }
>
> This one?
>
Yes...
Looks like kvm_unsync_page can be folded into mmu_need_write_protect
(after which we can drop lookup_page(), which is not a good API). But
that's after we solve the current problem.
Looks like the addition of a second role for non-pge mode confuses the
mmu. After the second page is created, mmu_need_write_protect() will
return 1, but previously existing sptes can still be writable?
Looks like we need to call rmap_write_protect() when the new page is
created.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081221184146.8E00B250012@cleopatra.tlv.redhat.com>
2009-01-05 14:56 ` [PATCH] KVM: MMU: Segregate mmu pages created with different cr4.pge settings Alexander Graf
2009-01-06 10:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-06 14:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-06 14:29 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-06 15:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-06 16:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-07 6:49 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-07 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 10:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-07 11:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-07 13:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-08 19:53 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-09 0:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-09 10:43 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-11 9:12 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-01-11 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49636AE7.4090108@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox