From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPUID Masking MSRs Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:33:53 +0100 Message-ID: <49648511.8050401@suse.de> References: <1231318388-1899-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <49647EFB.1090309@redhat.com> <4893C049-E52F-4CB5-8A27-F14AF9314612@suse.de> <49648277.7030708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, joerg.roedel@amd.com To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:33070 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865AbZAGKd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:33:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49648277.7030708@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Alexander Graf wrote: >>> Note that Intel has similar functionality, called FlexMigration >>> IIRC, likely using different MSRs. >> >> Hum. I'll take a look at it to see if that's as easy to implement then. > > It's probably easy (well supporting both might be tricky) but if you > don't have a real test case then it's best to wait with it. Well if I could take the FlexMigration design into account when putting variables in the vcpu context, that'd be great. But I can't seem to find it in the Intel documentation, so I'll leave it for now. Alex