From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@suse.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Linux in VirtualPC in KVM fails
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:05:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49679FEB.6040208@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49678E6E.4020306@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> let's start with the scenario I tried to use: I have two levels of
>> virtualization. On the physical hardware I run a Linux with KVM. The KVM
>> guest is a Win2k3 VM which runs VirtualPC. In VirtualPC I try to run a
>> Linux again (openSUSE 11.1 to be specific, but that shouldn't matter).
>>
>> The boot menu comes up nicely and so on, but early in the kernel boot it
>> crashes:
>>
>> EIP is at kvm_deferred_mmu_op+0x46/0xbf
>> Call Trace:
>> [<c0117f79>] kvm_mmu_write+0x59/0x61
>> [<c011bad9>] set_pte_vaddr+0x95/0xec
>> [<c011b3b2>] __native_set_fixmap+0x1d/0x24
>> [<c054ae5b>] test_wp_bit+0x24/0x6c
>> [<c054b6b1>] mem_init+0x295/0x2b8
>> [<c053a8a3>] start_kernel+0x262/0x31f
>>
>> Now obviously this is a KVM function where there should be none. The
>> problem seems to be that VirtualPC doesn't intercept cpuid and thus the
>> VirtualPC guest sees the KVM cpuid values where it better wouldn't.
>> Consequently, it turns on the paravirt support for KVM which is exactly
>> wrong and leads to the crash on the first hypercall.
>>
>> The guest has no chance to detect correctly if it's running directly on
>> KVM or if there is another virtualization layer which can't emulate
>> cpuid. So the fix must involve the mechanism itself. Alex has suggested
>> to change the interface to use a KVM-specific MSR instead of cpuid as
>> these should be handled by any virtualization software. I'm copying him
>> so he can take over for the details, I just want to get the discussion
>> started.
>>
>> So... Comments? Suggestions? Patches? ;-)
>>
>
> Gaa. Looks like cpuid is totally broken by first-generation
> virtualization products.
Not at all. There's no reason that a JIT'ing virtualization product
can't rewrite CPUID to a function call and then mask off unsupported
bits. It's a bug in the virtualization product if it doesn't do this.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-09 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 15:43 Linux in VirtualPC in KVM fails Kevin Wolf
2009-01-09 17:50 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-09 19:00 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-09 19:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-09 19:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-09 20:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-11 7:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-09 19:34 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-09 19:05 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-01-09 19:24 ` Alexander Graf
2009-01-09 20:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-11 7:17 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49679FEB.6040208@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox