From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Linux in VirtualPC in KVM fails Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: <49699CB2.4020400@redhat.com> References: <4967708E.2060907@suse.de> <49678E6E.4020306@redhat.com> <49679FAA.3000802@codemonkey.ws> <4967A64C.7070702@redhat.com> <4967AF51.6060400@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , Kevin Wolf , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37591 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751080AbZAKHQK (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:16:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4967AF51.6060400@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Apparently it isn't. I know of one other fullvirt product that does >> not jit kernel code. Or maybe they wanted to preserve consistency >> between kernel cpuid and host cpuid. > > How can you get away with not jitting kernel code? > http://bellard.org/qemu/kqemu-tech.html#SEC12 -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function