From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, markmc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm:virtio-net: Run TX from the I/O thread
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:12:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497862A7.8040408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090121230642.10404.65372.stgit@kvm.aw>
Alex Williamson wrote:
> This is an attempt to improve the latency of virtio-net while not hurting
> throughput. I wanted to try moving packet TX into a different thread
> so we can quickly return to the guest after it kicks us to send packets
> out. I also switched the order of when the tx_timer comes into play, so
> we can get an inital burst of packets out, then wait for the timer to
> fire and notify us if there's more to do. Here's what it does for me
> (average of 5 runs each, testing to a remote system on a 1Gb network):
>
> netperf TCP_STREAM: 939.22Mb/s -> 935.24Mb/s = 99.58%
> netperf TCP_RR: 2028.72/s -> 3927.99/s = 193.62%
> tbench: 92.99MB/s -> 99.97MB/s = 107.51%
>
> I'd be interested to hear if it helps or hurts anyone else. Thanks,
>
My worry with this change is that increases cpu utilization even more
than it increases bandwidth, so that our bits/cycle measure decreases.
The descriptors (and perhaps data) are likely on the same cache as the
vcpu, and moving the transmit to the iothread will cause them to move to
the iothread's cache.
My preferred approach to increasing both bandwidth and bits/cycle (the
latter figure is more important IMO, unfortunately benchmarks don't
measure it) is to aio-enable tap and raw sockets. The vcpu thread would
only touch the packet descriptors (not data) and submit all packets in
one io_submit() call. Unfortunately a huge amount of work is needed to
pull this off.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 23:08 [PATCH] kvm:virtio-net: Run TX from the I/O thread Alex Williamson
2009-01-22 12:12 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-22 12:48 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-01-22 18:36 ` Alex Williamson
2009-01-22 12:47 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-01-22 13:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-22 18:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-22 13:42 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497862A7.8040408@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox