From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: Accessing pv_info from userland Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:55:00 -0600 Message-ID: <4984F2E4.6050708@codemonkey.ws> References: <893823750901310419q63e9b648u9c959bc2689ef94d@mail.gmail.com> <5d6222a80901310504x76363751p9c28a63a3f01530@mail.gmail.com> <4984A825.3020904@codemonkey.ws> <5d6222a80901311155l2c20fa0aw8cabdac5e6f3caaa@mail.gmail.com> <4984BDE7.2060503@codemonkey.ws> <20D1253D-D3EF-4C1D-9F7F-964F64A0E412@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glauber Costa , Bryan McLellan , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:9522 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752124AbZBAAzU (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:55:20 -0500 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so375413ywe.1 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:55:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20D1253D-D3EF-4C1D-9F7F-964F64A0E412@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alexander Graf wrote: > On 31.01.2009, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Why not rather do > > Platform: native Some architectures may find the use of "native" to describe the absence of a hypervisor as being somewhat offensive. I can think of two particular architectures where the "native" configuration includes a hypervisor :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori