From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Resend: patch: qemu + hugetlbfs.. Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:15:09 +0200 Message-ID: <498B108D.2020800@redhat.com> References: <48764DAF.6060502@codemonkey.ws> <48766E03.4090901@third-harmonic.com> <48767558.50301@codemonkey.ws> <48767B20.20806@third-harmonic.com> <4876815E.3010109@codemonkey.ws> <48B33AAD.8000508@third-harmonic.com> <496FEECB.2060208@third-harmonic.com> <4975A78B.1060101@redhat.com> <497A34EA.3050703@redhat.com> <498B08EA.4020908@redhat.com> <20090205161201.GA5403@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: john cooper , john cooper , kvm@vger.kernel.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56078 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752541AbZBEQRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:17:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090205161201.GA5403@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> >> Sorry, still rejects horribly. What did you generate this against? >> >> The kernel/ part seems unrelated. >> > > This was merged through the kvm-devel branch (unless you dropped it). > Right, so that's why it rejected. I even saw it in the log when I tried to find why it rejected... and ignored it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function