From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Drop unused evaluations from IO handlers
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:28:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498ECFDF.8080003@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498EA744.6050903@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Looks like neither the direction nor the rep prefix are used anymore.
>>
>
> Right, this was due to both vmx and svm not fully decoding string pio
> instructions.
>
>> Drop related evaluations from SVM's and VMX's I/O exit handlers.
>>
>
> Missing signoff.
>
Ooops.
-------->
Looks like neither the direction nor the rep prefix are used anymore.
Drop related evaluations from SVM's and VMX's I/O exit handlers.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 4 +---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 1c4a018..22e88a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static int shutdown_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
static int io_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
{
u32 io_info = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1; /* address size bug? */
- int size, down, in, string, rep;
+ int size, in, string;
unsigned port;
++svm->vcpu.stat.io_exits;
@@ -1213,8 +1213,6 @@ static int io_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
in = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_TYPE_MASK) != 0;
port = io_info >> 16;
size = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_SIZE_MASK) >> SVM_IOIO_SIZE_SHIFT;
- rep = (io_info & SVM_IOIO_REP_MASK) != 0;
- down = (svm->vmcb->save.rflags & X86_EFLAGS_DF) != 0;
skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
return kvm_emulate_pio(&svm->vcpu, kvm_run, in, size, port);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 9913a1d..bd7097d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ static int handle_triple_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
static int handle_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
{
unsigned long exit_qualification;
- int size, down, in, string, rep;
+ int size, in, string;
unsigned port;
++vcpu->stat.io_exits;
@@ -2713,8 +2713,6 @@ static int handle_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
size = (exit_qualification & 7) + 1;
in = (exit_qualification & 8) != 0;
- down = (vmcs_readl(GUEST_RFLAGS) & X86_EFLAGS_DF) != 0;
- rep = (exit_qualification & 32) != 0;
port = exit_qualification >> 16;
skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-08 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 17:15 [PATCH] x86: Drop unused evaluations from IO handlers Jan Kiszka
2009-02-08 9:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-08 12:28 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-02-09 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498ECFDF.8080003@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox