From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: guest: only batch user pte updates
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:17:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4991FD0D.1070108@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090210214532.GA4082@amt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> KVM's paravirt mmu pte batching has issues with, at least, kernel
> updates from DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.
>
> This has been experienced with slab allocation from irq context from
> within lazy mmu sections:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480822
>
> DEBUG_PAGEALLOC will map/unmap the kernel pagetables to catch bad
> accesses, with code such as:
>
> __change_page_attr():
>
> /*
> * Do we really change anything ?
> */
> if (pte_val(old_pte) != pte_val(new_pte)) {
> set_pte_atomic(kpte, new_pte);
> cpa->flags |= CPA_FLUSHTLB;
> }
>
> A present->nonpresent update can be queued, but not yet committed to
> memory. So the set_pte_atomic will be skipped but the update flushed
> afterwards. set_pte_ATOMIC.
>
Are you saying that there's a queued update which means that old_pte is
a stale value which happens to equal new_pte, so new_pte is never set?
OK, sounds like a generic problem, of the same sort we've had with
kmap_atomic being used in interrupt routines in lazy mode.
In this case, I think the proper fix is to call
arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() before reading old_pte to make sure its up to
date, and calling it again when processing CPA_FLUSHTLB. Could you try
the patch below instead?
(BTW, set_pte_atomic doesn't mean synchronous; it just means its safe to
use on live ptes on 32-bit PAE machines which can't otherwise atomically
update a pte.)
J
commit 264d7d09de69b1f729adb43acc86bd504dd21251
Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Date: Tue Feb 10 14:15:52 2009 -0800
x86/cpa: make sure cpa is safe to call in lazy mmu mode
The CPA code may be called while we're in lazy mmu update mode - for
example, when using DEBUG_PAGE_ALLOC and doing a slab allocation
in an interrupt handler which interrupted a lazy mmu update. In this
case, the in memory pagetable state may be out of date due to pending
queued updates. We need to flush any pending updates before inspecting
the page table. Similarly, we must explicitly flush any modifications
CPA may have made (which comes down to flushing queued operations when
flushing the TLB).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index 84ba748..fb12f06 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -576,6 +576,13 @@ static int __change_page_attr(struct cpa_data *cpa, int primary)
else
address = *cpa->vaddr;
+ /*
+ * If we're called with lazy mmu updates enabled, the
+ * in-memory pte state may be stale. Flush pending updates to
+ * bring them up to date.
+ */
+ arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
+
repeat:
kpte = lookup_address(address, &level);
if (!kpte)
@@ -854,6 +861,13 @@ static int change_page_attr_set_clr(unsigned long *addr, int numpages,
} else
cpa_flush_all(cache);
+ /*
+ * If we've been called with lazy mmu updates enabled, then
+ * make sure that everything gets flushed out before we
+ * return.
+ */
+ arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
+
out:
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 21:45 KVM: guest: only batch user pte updates Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-10 22:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-02-10 22:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-02-10 23:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-11 11:56 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-11 16:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4991FD0D.1070108@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox