From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_DEASSIGNMENT
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:34:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4992C5C2.5030600@redhat.com>
References: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C01959AF3FF@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'kvm@vger.kernel.org'" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43906 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754781AbZBKMeO (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:34:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C01959AF3FF@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Han, Weidong wrote:
> define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_DEASSIGNMENT and KVM_DEASSIGN_PCI_DEVICE
> for device deassignment.
>
>
>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
> @@ -466,6 +469,8 @@ struct kvm_irq_routing {
>  #define KVM_ASSIGN_IRQ _IOR(KVMIO, 0x70, \
>  			    struct kvm_assigned_irq)
>  #define KVM_REINJECT_CONTROL      _IO(KVMIO, 0x71)
> +#define KVM_DEASSIGN_PCI_DEVICE _IOR(KVMIO, 0x72, \
> +				     struct kvm_assigned_pci_dev)
>  

Where's the implementation of this new ioctl?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function