public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	thuth@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v1] x86: Fix the logical destination mode test
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 18:27:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4993e419-5eef-46ba-5dd0-e35c7103190b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310140323.GA7132@fuller.cnet>


On 3/10/20 10:03 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 07:15:50PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
>> There are following issues with the ioapic logical destination mode test:
>>
>> - A race condition that is triggered when the interrupt handler
>>   ioapic_isr_86() is called at the same time by multiple vCPUs. Due to this
>>   the g_isr_86 is not correctly incremented. To prevent this a spinlock is
>>   added around ‘g_isr_86++’.
>>
>> - On older QEMU versions initial x2APIC ID is not set, that is why
>>   the local APIC IDs of each vCPUs are not configured. Hence the logical
>>   destination mode test fails/hangs. Adding ‘+x2apic’ to the qemu -cpu params
>>   ensures that the local APICs are configured every time, irrespective of the
>>   QEMU version.
>>
>> - With ‘-machine kernel_irqchip=split’ included in the ioapic test
>>   test_ioapic_self_reconfigure() always fails and somehow leads to a state where
>>   after submitting IOAPIC fixed delivery - logical destination mode request we
>>   never receive an interrupt back. For now, the physical and logical destination
>>   mode tests are moved above test_ioapic_self_reconfigure().
>>
>> Fixes: b2a1ee7e ("kvm-unit-test: x86: ioapic: Test physical and logical destination mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
> Looks good to me.

Hi,

I just wanted to follow up and see if there are any more suggestions for me to
improve this patch before it can be merged.


>
>> ---
>>  x86/ioapic.c      | 11 +++++++----
>>  x86/unittests.cfg |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/x86/ioapic.c b/x86/ioapic.c
>> index 742c711..3106531 100644
>> --- a/x86/ioapic.c
>> +++ b/x86/ioapic.c
>> @@ -432,10 +432,13 @@ static void test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode(void)
>>  }
>>  
>>  static volatile int g_isr_86;
>> +struct spinlock ioapic_lock;
>>  
>>  static void ioapic_isr_86(isr_regs_t *regs)
>>  {
>> +	spin_lock(&ioapic_lock);
>>  	++g_isr_86;
>> +	spin_unlock(&ioapic_lock);
>>  	set_irq_line(0x0e, 0);
>>  	eoi();
>>  }
>> @@ -501,6 +504,10 @@ int main(void)
>>  	test_ioapic_level_tmr(true);
>>  	test_ioapic_edge_tmr(true);
>>  
>> +	test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode();
>> +	if (cpu_count() > 3)
>> +		test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode();
>> +
>>  	if (cpu_count() > 1) {
>>  		test_ioapic_edge_tmr_smp(false);
>>  		test_ioapic_level_tmr_smp(false);
>> @@ -508,11 +515,7 @@ int main(void)
>>  		test_ioapic_edge_tmr_smp(true);
>>  
>>  		test_ioapic_self_reconfigure();
>> -		test_ioapic_physical_destination_mode();
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (cpu_count() > 3)
>> -		test_ioapic_logical_destination_mode();
>> -
>>  	return report_summary();
>>  }
>> diff --git a/x86/unittests.cfg b/x86/unittests.cfg
>> index f2401eb..d658bc8 100644
>> --- a/x86/unittests.cfg
>> +++ b/x86/unittests.cfg
>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ timeout = 30
>>  [ioapic]
>>  file = ioapic.flat
>>  smp = 4
>> -extra_params = -cpu qemu64
>> +extra_params = -cpu qemu64,+x2apic
>>  arch = x86_64
>>  
>>  [cmpxchg8b]
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1


-- 
Nitesh


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1583795750-33197-1-git-send-email-nitesh@redhat.com>
2020-03-09 23:25 ` [Patch v1] x86: Fix the logical destination mode test Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-03-10 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-16 22:27   ` Nitesh Narayan Lal [this message]
2020-03-17 15:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-14 14:01     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-14 15:14       ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-04-14 15:30         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-14 15:34           ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-04-14 16:11             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-14 16:27               ` Nitesh Narayan Lal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4993e419-5eef-46ba-5dd0-e35c7103190b@redhat.com \
    --to=nitesh@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilal@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox