From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Duffy Subject: Re: Problem with KVM-84 and more than 4 processors Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:04:15 -0600 Message-ID: <49AD7F2F.9090001@messageone.com> References: <49AD43C6.2080407@tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54298 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752064AbZCCTEW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:04:22 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LeZuc-0000CL-JR for kvm@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:04:18 +0000 Received: from 143.166.197.6 ([143.166.197.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:04:18 +0000 Received: from Charles_Duffy by 143.166.197.6 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:04:18 +0000 In-Reply-To: <49AD43C6.2080407@tu-berlin.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Matthias Hovestadt wrote: > This mail seems to be somehow related to the bug report of Justin Keogh > from 30th Dec 2008. He was able to fix his problem by simply setting > CONFIG_KVM=m, but I'm already using modules, so his workaround can't be > applied here. Quick question -- does your dmesg output include "loaded kvm module (kvm-84)" [ie. including the version number]? If not, it may be that you're using the module built with your kernel rather than the one built with the kvm release package.