From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthias Hovestadt <matthias.hovestadt@tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Problem with KVM-84 and more than 4 processors
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:58:40 +0100
Message-ID: <49AE8910.6020305@tu-berlin.de>
References: <49AD43C6.2080407@tu-berlin.de> <49AD7F2F.9090001@messageone.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Charles Duffy <Charles_Duffy@messageone.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.TU-Berlin.DE ([130.149.7.33]:58543 "EHLO mail.tu-berlin.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751611AbZCDOC3 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:02:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <49AD7F2F.9090001@messageone.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Charles!

>> This mail seems to be somehow related to the bug report of Justin Keogh
>> from 30th Dec 2008. He was able to fix his problem by simply setting
>> CONFIG_KVM=m, but I'm already using modules, so his workaround can't be
>> applied here.
> 
> Quick question -- does your dmesg output include "loaded kvm module 
> (kvm-84)" [ie. including the version number]? If not, it may be that 
> you're using the module built with your kernel rather than the one built 
> with the kvm release package.

This is from my dmesg output:

[   11.983892] loaded kvm module (kvm-84)


Best,
Matthias