From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:22:07 -0500 Message-ID: <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249]:26008 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752282AbZCHPWM (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:22:12 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so664196anc.1 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on >> the recent 0.10.0 release. You can access it via anonymous SVN via: >> >> svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 >> >> The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at least >> the next major release. If submitting a bug fix, please consider >> also testing the patch against stable and sending multiple patches if >> appropriate. Using a tag in the subject line like [STABLE] would >> also be helpful to indicate to the maintainers that a patch should be >> considered for the stable tree. >> >> As the stable tree accumulates fixes, we'll make new stable releases >> from the tree. >> > > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the > latter) I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. Regards, Anthony Liguori