From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:38:50 +0200 Message-ID: <49B50DDA.3010007@redhat.com> References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , kvm-devel To: Paul Brook Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48838 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751128AbZCIMn5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:43:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Paul Brook wrote: >>>> svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0 >>>> >>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the >>> latter) >>> >> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion. >> > > Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be > stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases). > This is my preference as well. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function