From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:40:37 -0500
Message-ID: <49B51C55.6000803@codemonkey.ws>
References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:32924 "EHLO
	yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750840AbZCINkm (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:40:42 -0400
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so996108ywh.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 06:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200903091232.54276.paul@codesourcery.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>>>         
>>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
>>> latter)
>>>       
>> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.
>>     
>
> Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
> stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).
>   

FWIW, I renamed the branch to stable_0_10.

Regards,

Anthony Liguroi

> Paul
>