Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Avi Kivity]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on the 
> recent 0.10.0 release.  You can access it via anonymous SVN via:
>
>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>
> The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at least the 
> next major release.  If submitting a bug fix, please consider also 
> testing the patch against stable and sending multiple patches if 
> appropriate.  Using a tag in the subject line like [STABLE] would also 
> be helpful to indicate to the maintainers that a patch should be 
> considered for the stable tree.
>
> As the stable tree accumulates fixes, we'll make new stable releases 
> from the tree.
>

Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the latter)

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Anthony Liguori]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on 
>> the recent 0.10.0 release.  You can access it via anonymous SVN via:
>>
>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>
>> The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at least 
>> the next major release.  If submitting a bug fix, please consider 
>> also testing the patch against stable and sending multiple patches if 
>> appropriate.  Using a tag in the subject line like [STABLE] would 
>> also be helpful to indicate to the maintainers that a patch should be 
>> considered for the stable tree.
>>
>> As the stable tree accumulates fixes, we'll make new stable releases 
>> from the tree.
>>
>
> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the 
> latter)

I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Avi Kivity]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to announce the creation of a QEMU stable branch based on 
>>> the recent 0.10.0 release.  You can access it via anonymous SVN via:
>>>
>>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>>
>>> The stable branch will receive bug fixes from trunk until at least 
>>> the next major release.  If submitting a bug fix, please consider 
>>> also testing the patch against stable and sending multiple patches 
>>> if appropriate.  Using a tag in the subject line like [STABLE] would 
>>> also be helpful to indicate to the maintainers that a patch should 
>>> be considered for the stable tree.
>>>
>>> As the stable tree accumulates fixes, we'll make new stable releases 
>>> from the tree.
>>>
>>
>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the 
>> latter)
>
> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Anthony Liguori]

Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?

That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable 
naming convention.  I was hoping to have the first stable release about 
2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff 
in the stable tree.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Dietmar Maurer]

I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Anthony Liguori
> Sent: Sonntag, 08. März 2009 17:13
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kvm-devel
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
> 
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?
> 
> That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable
> naming convention.  I was hoping to have the first stable release about
> 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff
> in the stable tree.

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?
> 
> That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable 
> naming convention.  I was hoping to have the first stable release about 
> 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff 
> in the stable tree.

I think 0.10.1 makes perfect sense for next stable release name.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Paul Brook]

> >>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
> > Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
> > latter)
>
> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.

Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).

Paul

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Avi Kivity]

Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>>>         
>>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
>>> latter)
>>>       
>> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.
>>     
>
> Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
> stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).
>   

This is my preference as well.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Anthony Liguori]

Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>  svn co svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/branches/stable_0_10_0
>>>>         
>>> Will a stable release be called 0.10.0.1 or 0.10.1? (I'd prefer the
>>> latter)
>>>       
>> I was thinking the later but am open to suggestion.
>>     
>
> Definitely the latter. I think the branch is mis-named, it should be 
> stable_0_10 (with 0_10_0, 0_10_1 etc tags for actual releases).
>   

FWIW, I renamed the branch to stable_0_10.

Regards,

Anthony Liguroi

> Paul
>   

Re: [Bulk] RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Doug Schaefer]

Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). 
>
>
>   

It's not that stable....

Doug.