From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Schaefer Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:24:19 -0400 Message-ID: <49B67813.2000802@rogers.com> References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3A7C1.2090707@redhat.com> <49B3E29F.1080400@codemonkey.ws> <49B3E4E8.9080700@redhat.com> <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws> <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Avi Kivity , kvm-devel To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from smtp113.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.225.229]:45547 "HELO smtp113.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753608AbZCJObE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:31:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dietmar Maurer wrote: > I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). > > > It's not that stable.... Doug.