From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: make rpm question... Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:53:07 +0200 Message-ID: <49BCFA33.1050309@redhat.com> References: <49B029B6.30502@uvic.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Vliet Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55894 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753612AbZCOMxc (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:53:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49B029B6.30502@uvic.ca> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Matt Vliet wrote: > Hi, > just a quick question about running make rpm on kvm-84. > > The build succeeds with no problems, but the two rpms is creates are: > rpmtop/RPMS/i386/kvm-0.0-devel.i386.rpm > rpmtop/RPMS/i386/kvm-debuginfo-0.0-devel.i386.rpm > > Is this just weird naming, or should I not be using these RPMs to > install KVM onto a system? It's just wierd. You can use the rpmrelease variable to set the version. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function