From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: strange guest slowness after some time
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:19:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BD007C.9030809@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B4EE8F.7050001@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity schrieb:
>>> I'm guessing there's a problem with timers or timer interrupts.
>>>
>>> What is the host cpu?
>>
>> 4 entries like this in /proc/cpuinfo:
>>
>> processor : 3
>> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
>> cpu family : 15
>> model : 65
>> model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212
>>
>
> That's probably the kvmclock issue that hit older AMDs. It was fixed in
> kvm-84, please try that.
I've been running it for about a week now with kvm-84 and no guest got slow.
Can it be related to using cpufreq and ondemand governor?
1) with kvm-83 and cpufreq/ondemand, guests go totally crazy (see
"Houston, we have May 15, 1953" thread)
2) with kvm-83 without cpufreq, "slowness" affects guests sometimes
3) with kvm-84 and cpufreq/ondemand, "slowness" affects guests sometimes
4) with kvm-84 without cpufreq, everything run correctly (at least it
does for a week now)
Does anything from this make any sense? I would really like to use
cpufreq/ondemand on the host with KVM, as my tests show it would save me
about 50 EUR on electricity bills per one of such servers yearly.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 15:47 strange guest slowness after some time Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-07 16:41 ` Johannes Baumann
2009-03-07 16:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:18 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:28 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 13:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:22 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:25 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:31 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 11:37 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 12:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 12:52 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-15 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 13:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2009-03-17 10:47 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 11:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 11:25 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 15:32 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 15:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:01 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 18:49 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 6:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 7:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 9:08 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:38 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-08 11:02 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-06-16 14:26 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-31 8:50 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-01 4:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-04-01 6:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-06 15:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-08 0:49 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-08 5:45 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:49 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 12:05 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 14:07 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 14:58 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-31 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 16:12 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 18:55 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 19:04 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 19:24 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 20:14 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 22:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 23:02 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-18 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-19 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-19 5:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 6:08 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 8:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 14:11 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-17 18:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 5:54 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 16:27 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:14 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BD007C.9030809@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).