From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-userspace: x86: Support for breakpoints in ROM code
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:53:30 +0100
Message-ID: <49BEA02A.1070909@siemens.com>
References: <49BE9EF7.7010005@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:19395 "EHLO lizzard.sbs.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752422AbZCPSxu (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:53:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49BE9EF7.7010005@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Align qemu-kvm-x86 with upstream kvm support /wrt software breakpoint
> support in ROM code.

Hmm, this might not be needed as kvm-userspace is not protecting its
ROM. That's why I didn't pushed this so far. However, aligning isn't
bad. But dropping this duplication would be better...

Jan

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
> 
>  qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c b/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> index 06ef775..05a9c4c 100644
> --- a/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> +++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm-x86.c
> @@ -680,12 +680,32 @@ void kvm_arch_cpu_reset(CPUState *env)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_arch_insert_sw_breakpoint(CPUState *env, struct kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp)
> +#ifdef KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
> +static int kvm_patch_opcode_byte(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr, uint8_t val)
>  {
> -    uint8_t int3 = 0xcc;
> +    target_phys_addr_t phys_page_addr;
> +    unsigned long pd;
> +    uint8_t *ptr;
> +
> +    phys_page_addr = cpu_get_phys_page_debug(env, addr & TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> +    if (phys_page_addr == -1)
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    pd = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(phys_page_addr);
> +    if ((pd & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != IO_MEM_RAM &&
> +        (pd & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != IO_MEM_ROM && !(pd & IO_MEM_ROMD))
> +        return -EINVAL;
>  
> +    ptr = phys_ram_base + (pd & TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
> +                        + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> +    *ptr = val;
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_insert_sw_breakpoint(CPUState *env, struct kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp)
> +{
>      if (cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, bp->pc, (uint8_t *)&bp->saved_insn, 1, 0) ||
> -        cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, bp->pc, &int3, 1, 1))
> +        kvm_patch_opcode_byte(env, bp->pc, 0xcc))
>          return -EINVAL;
>      return 0;
>  }
> @@ -695,12 +715,11 @@ int kvm_arch_remove_sw_breakpoint(CPUState *env, struct kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp)
>      uint8_t int3;
>  
>      if (cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, bp->pc, &int3, 1, 0) || int3 != 0xcc ||
> -        cpu_memory_rw_debug(env, bp->pc, (uint8_t *)&bp->saved_insn, 1, 1))
> +        kvm_patch_opcode_byte(env, bp->pc, bp->saved_insn))
>          return -EINVAL;
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>  static struct {
>      target_ulong addr;
>      int len;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux