From: Felix Leimbach <felix.leimbach@gmx.net>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange guest slowness after some time
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:54:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C08C92.4040706@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49BFD999.503@redhat.com>
Avi,
Avi Kivity wrote:
> packet counters are will within 32-bit limits. byte counters not so
> interesting.
This night my test overflowed the *packet* counters twice without any
slowness or loss of connectivity.
Snippet from my log file of the sending VM (linux 2.6.27):
Wed Mar 18 05:14:18 CET 2009: TX packet counter = 4292944043
Wed Mar 18 05:15:18 CET 2009: TX packet counter = 6259211
ifconfig after stress test:
# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:74:01:01
inet addr:10.75.13.1 Bcast:10.75.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:150 Metric:1
RX packets:48950340 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:727911367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:3686511201 (3.4 GiB) TX bytes:4207842269 (3.9 GiB)
I didn't create a log file on the receiving Windows VM but they must
have overflowed as well. Its packet counters are currently:
Sent: 47.112.780
Received: 1.515.275.693
No problem on the Windows guest either.
So the problem must lie elsewhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 15:47 strange guest slowness after some time Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-07 16:41 ` Johannes Baumann
2009-03-07 16:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:18 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:28 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 13:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 9:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:22 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:25 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:31 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 10:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 10:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 11:37 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-09 12:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 12:52 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-15 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-15 13:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 10:47 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 11:16 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 11:25 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 15:32 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 15:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:01 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 18:49 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 6:36 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 7:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 9:08 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:38 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-08 11:02 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-06-16 14:26 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-31 8:50 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-01 4:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-04-01 6:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-06 15:19 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-08 0:49 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-08 5:45 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:49 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 11:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 12:05 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 12:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 14:07 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-26 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 14:58 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-31 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 16:12 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:05 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 18:55 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 19:04 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 19:24 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 20:14 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 22:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 23:02 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-18 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-19 4:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-19 5:22 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 6:08 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-19 8:03 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-19 14:11 ` David S. Ahern
2009-03-17 18:57 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-18 5:54 ` Felix Leimbach [this message]
2009-03-17 16:27 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-17 17:14 ` Felix Leimbach
2009-03-17 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-17 17:34 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C08C92.4040706@gmx.net \
--to=felix.leimbach@gmx.net \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).