From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: strange guest slowness after some time Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <49C0B556.5030007@redhat.com> References: <49B29705.6000904@wpkg.org> <49B4E7A6.3090601@redhat.com> <49B4EDC9.9020504@wpkg.org> <49B4EE8F.7050001@redhat.com> <49BD007C.9030809@wpkg.org> <49BF7FB6.9080503@wpkg.org> <49BF8686.5050707@redhat.com> <49BF88BE.7040805@wpkg.org> <49BFC276.1080600@gmx.net> <49BFC53D.3020809@wpkg.org> <49BFD752.9050706@gmx.net> <49BFD84C.5010704@redhat.com> <49BFF0CF.60904@gmx.net> <49C0967D.2070203@redhat.com> <49C0A955.6010702@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Chmielewski To: Felix Leimbach Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42553 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754080AbZCRIs2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:48:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49C0A955.6010702@gmx.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Felix Leimbach wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> Felix Leimbach wrote: >>> Is tsc breakage still s.th. to watch out after I've upgraded to the >>> Shanghai quadcores? >> >> No, should be gone. >> >> Will you have the old server around so we can test things? > > No, I'll be upgrading the existing server. If you have specific tests in > mind I can perform them in the next two weeks before the upgrade. But I > cannot restart the server because a few VMs are in production use. > > If a developer is interested in the old CPU (Opteron 2212) then I can > have it mailed to him/her. > Thanks for the offer; I can probably find a similar cpu, the main difficulty is replicating the problem. Since there are now at least two reports, maybe it won't be that difficult. If you can figure out a way to reliably reproduce this, that would be most helpful. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function