public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Linux AIO support when using O_DIRECT
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:10:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C7D096.3000302@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090323172928.GB29449@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:14:58PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> I'd like to see the O_DIRECT bounce buffering removed in favor of the  
>> DMA API bouncing.  Once that happens, raw_read and raw_pread can  
>> disappear.  block-raw-posix becomes much simpler.
>>     
>
> See my vectored I/O patches for doing the bounce buffering at the
> optimal place for the aio path. Note that from my reading of the
> qcow/qcow2 code they might send down unaligned requests, which is
> something the dma api would not help with.
>   

I was going to look today at applying those.

> For the buffered I/O path we will always have to do some sort of buffering
> due to all the partition header reading / etc.  And given how that part
> isn't performance critical my preference would be to keep doing it in
> bdrv_pread/write and guarantee the lowlevel drivers proper alignment.
>   

I really dislike having so many APIs.  I'd rather have an aio API that 
took byte accesses or have pread/pwrite always be emulated with a full 
sector read/write

>> We would drop the signaling stuff and have the thread pool use an fd to  
>> signal.  The big problem with that right now is that it'll cause a  
>> performance regression for certain platforms until we have the IO thread  
>> in place.
>>     
>
> Talking about signaling, does anyone remember why the Linux signalfd/
> eventfd support is only in kvm but not in upstream qemu?
>   

Because upstream QEMU doesn't yet have an IO thread.

TCG chains together TBs and if you have a tight loop in a VCPU, then the 
only way to break out of the loop is to receive a signal.  The signal 
handler will call cpu_interrupt() which will unchain TBs allowing TCG 
execution to break once you return from the signal handler.

An IO thread solves this in a different way by letting select() always 
run in parallel to TCG VCPU execution.  When select() returns you can 
send a signal to the TCG VCPU thread to break it out of chained TBs.

Not all IO in qemu generates a signal so this a potential problem but in 
practice, if we don't generate a signal for disk IO completion, a number 
of real world guests breaks (mostly non-x86 boards).

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-23 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-23 15:45 [PATCH][RFC] Linux AIO support when using O_DIRECT Anthony Liguori
2009-03-23 16:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2009-03-23 17:14   ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-23 17:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-23 18:10       ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-03-23 18:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-23 19:35           ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-23 17:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-23 19:58     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-23 20:32       ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-23 17:26   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C7D096.3000302@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox