From: Takeshi Sone <ts1@himeya.com>
To: Nolan <nolan@sigbus.net>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I/O errors after migration - why?
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:38:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D05ABF.6040106@himeya.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238264109.15350.260.camel@voxel>
Hello,
I had similar problem regarding block I/O and migration.
And it is worked around by qemu "stop" command and waiting 1 second
before starting migration (and cont after migration).
See the Ubuntu bug report I posted.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/341682
I think Nolan description here explains why stop and wait works.
Nolan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 11:21 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> Nolan schrieb:
>>> Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo <at> wpkg.org> writes:
>>>> I'm trying to perform live migration by following the instructions on
>>>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Migration.
>>>> Unfortunately, it doesn't work very well - guest is migrated, but looses
>>>> access to its disk.
>>> The LSI logic scsi device model doesn't implement device state save/restore.
>>> Any suspend/resume, snapshot or migration will fail.
>> Oh, that sucks - as not everything supports virtio (which doesn't work
>> for me as well for some reason) - like Windows (which should be
>> addressed soon with block virtio drivers), but also older installations,
>> running older kernels.
>
> It is indeed a shame. I wish I had the time to investigate and resolve
> the problems with my patch that I linked to previously.
>
> LSI in particular is important for interoperability, as that is what
> VMware uses.
>
>> Does IDE support migration?
>
> It appears to, but I am not 100% sure that it will always survive
> migration under heavy IO load. I've gotten mixed messages on whether or
> not the qemu core waits for all in flight IOs to complete or if the
> device models need to checkpoint pending IOs themselves. Experimental
> evidence suggests that it does not. Also, from ide.c's checkpoint save
> code:
> /* XXX: if a transfer is pending, we do not save it yet */
>
> I think the ideal here would be to stop the CPUs, but let the device
> models continue to run. Once all pending IOs have completed (and DMAed
> data and/or descriptors into guest memory, or raised interrupts, or
> whatever) then checkpoint all device state. When the guest resumes, it
> will see an unusual flurry of IO completions and/or interrupts, but it
> should be able to handle that OK. Shouldn't look much different from
> SMM taking over for a while during high IO load.
>
> This would save a lot of (unwritten, complex, hard to test)
> checkpointing code in the device models. Might cause a missed timer
> interrupt or two if there is a lot of slow IO, but that can be
> compensated for if needed.
>
>>> I sent a patch that partially addresses this (but is buggy in the presence of
>>> in-flight IO):
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-01/msg00744.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-30 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 16:34 I/O errors after migration - why? Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-27 16:51 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-27 17:01 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-27 17:14 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-27 17:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-03-27 18:43 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-28 1:08 ` Nolan
2009-03-28 10:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-28 18:15 ` Nolan
2009-03-30 5:38 ` Takeshi Sone [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D05ABF.6040106@himeya.com \
--to=ts1@himeya.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=nolan@sigbus.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox