kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "BRAUN, Stefanie" <Stefanie.Braun@alcatel-lucent.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: KVM performance
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:34:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DB8E8A.1090908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C51834E@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de>

BRAUN, Stefanie wrote:
> 1. Subtest: VLC reads video from local disk and streams it via udp to another pc
> 		Host performance: 		11% 		11%
>             kvm process in host (top):	22%		22%
> 		vlc process in vmu (top): 	15%		7%
>
>   

While this isn't wonderful, it's not your major bottleneck now.  What's 
the bandwidth generated by the workload?

>
> 4. Subtest: Reading video locally, adding a logo to the video stream and then saving the video locally
> 		Host performance: 		50% 		50%
>             kvm process in host (top) : 	99%		99%
> 		vlc process in vmu (top) : 	99%		99%
>   

Now this is bad.  Please provide the output of 'kvm_stat -1' while this 
is running.  Also, describe the guest.  Is it Linux?  if so, i386 or 
x86_64?  and is CONFIG_HIGHMEM enabled?

UDP performance is a known issue now, and we are working on it.  TCP is 
much better due to segmentation offload.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-07 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-03 11:32 KVM performance BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-06 11:45 ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]   ` <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C51834A@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de>
     [not found]     ` <49DA2F54.8090109@redhat.com>
2009-04-07 17:00       ` AW: AW: " BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-07 17:34         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-04-08 11:38           ` AW: " BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-09 15:34             ` BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-11 16:19               ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-14  8:26                 ` AW: " BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-14  8:47                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-16 13:27                     ` AW: " BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-16 14:40                       ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-06 12:13 ` Hauke Hoffmann
2009-04-06 16:30   ` AW: " BRAUN, Stefanie
2009-04-07 12:58   ` BRAUN, Stefanie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DB8E8A.1090908@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=Stefanie.Braun@alcatel-lucent.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).