From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: kvm-85: virtio-blk not working
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:13:50 -0500
Message-ID: <49F093BE.9030601@codemonkey.ws>
References: <200904231043.05001.gerd.von.egidy@intra2net.com> <200904231110.47416.iggy@theiggy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Gerd v. Egidy" <gerd.von.egidy@intra2net.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Brian Jackson <iggy@theiggy.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28]:30155 "EHLO
	yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751392AbZDWQNz (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:55 -0400
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so369121yxj.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200904231110.47416.iggy@theiggy.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Brian Jackson wrote:
> Your problem is that index's are per interface type, so both of your drives 
> should be index=0 since they are different interface types.
>   

More specifically, with virtio-blk, you cannot have discontinuous 
indexes.   In other words, having index=0, index=1, index=2 is valid, 
but having index=1, index=2, index=4 is not.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori