public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Debugging an inconsistent shadow page table
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:32:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F43846.40807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F2E79A.6070602@web.de>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> turning on MMU_DEBUG and AUDIT in arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c (and fixing a build
> error, patch will follow) I got this (and then a #GP :( - patch will
> follow):
>
> ...
> kvm_mmu_get_page: looking gfn 0 role f0120
> kvm_mmu_get_page: found
> kvm_mmu_get_page: looking gfn 0 role f0220
> kvm_mmu_get_page: found
> kvm_mmu_get_page: looking gfn 0 role f0320
> kvm_mmu_get_page: found
> kvm_mmu_get_page: looking gfn e1f role e0044
> kvm_mmu_get_page: adding gfn e1f role e0044
> rmap_write_protect: spte ffff8100660a60f8 7ca98067
> paging64_page_fault: addr 100105 err 19
> audit_write_protection: (pre page fault) shadow page has writable mappings: gfn e1f role e0044
> audit: (pre page fault) nontrapping pte in nonleaf level: levels 4 gva 8000000000 level 4 pte 0
>
> Is the last message indicating a problem? I get it very early during
> guest boot. oos_shadow is disabled.
>   

Yes.  It means the guest will receive a page fault if is accesses 
anything this pte points to.  Theoretically we could have made this 
work, but we never did.

But the message is self-contradictory.  Level 4 PTEs map 0.5TB each, and 
the gva mentioned isn't 0.5TB aligned.

> I'm currently trying to understand an obvious inconsistency in the pte
> describing a page of the virtio-net rx ring. On some guests with some
> qemu (upstream) command lines I can trigger this with '-smb /some/path'
> and then doing smbclient -L in the guest. Once the inconsistency slipped
> in, host and guest see different page contents and virtio-net stops to
> work. Very strange, but fortunately easily reproducible here. Any hints
> or debugging suggestions welcome!
>   

What type of inconsistency? pfn or flags?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-26 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-25 10:36 Debugging an inconsistent shadow page table Jan Kiszka
2009-04-26 10:32 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-04-26 11:11   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-26 11:27     ` Gleb Natapov
2009-04-26 11:34       ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-26 11:36       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-26 11:39         ` Gleb Natapov
2009-04-26 11:41           ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-26 11:42         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F43846.40807@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox