From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:06:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F5CA08.6060003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904271600.30599.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Monday 27 April 2009 14:31:36 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
>
>> Add optional MSI-X support: use a vector per virtqueue with
>> fallback to a common vector and finally to regular interrupt.
>> Teach all drivers to use it.
>>
>> I added 2 new virtio operations: request_vqs/free_vqs because MSI
>> needs to know the total number of vectors upfront.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>
>
> I dont know, if that is feasible for MSI, but the transport(virtio_pci) should
> already know the number of virtqueues, which should match the number of
> vectors, no?
>
> In fact, the transport has to have a way of getting the number of virtqeues
> because find_vq returns ENOENT on invalid index numbers.
>
One thing I thought was to decouple the virtqueue count from the MSI
entry count, and let the guest choose how many MSI entries it wants to
use. This is useful if it wants several queues to share an interrupt,
perhaps it wants both rx and tx rings on one cpu to share a single vector.
So the device could expose a large, constant number of MSI entries, and
in addition expose a table mapping ring number to msi entry number. The
guest could point all rings to one entry, or have each ring use a
private entry, or anything in between.
That saves us the new API (at the expense of a lot more code, but with
added flexibility).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-27 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 12:31 [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 14:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:06 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-04-27 15:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 16:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 6:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 17:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 17:51 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 18:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 19:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-28 21:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-04 9:21 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-04 11:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-04 11:57 ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-27 14:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-27 17:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F5CA08.6060003@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox