From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] interrupt injection rework
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:40:33 +0300
Message-ID: <49F82EA1.7000704@redhat.com>
References: <1240325111-3725-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <49F594CE.6050904@redhat.com> <49F81E46.2020104@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55693 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752749AbZD2Kki (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:40:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49F81E46.2020104@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hmm, to which branch? Or did you just forget to also push it...
>
>   

In general, if I apply and don't push a couple of hours later, it means 
there are regressions.

I think these regressions are from the recent qemu merge, not the 
interrupt rework.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.