From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] interrupt injection rework Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: <49F8303B.9060102@siemens.com> References: <1240325111-3725-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <49F594CE.6050904@redhat.com> <49F81E46.2020104@siemens.com> <49F82EA1.7000704@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:24125 "EHLO lizzard.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751288AbZD2Ksp (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:48:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49F82EA1.7000704@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hmm, to which branch? Or did you just forget to also push it... >> >> > > In general, if I apply and don't push a couple of hours later, it means > there are regressions. > > I think these regressions are from the recent qemu merge, not the > interrupt rework. I guess so as well, specifically as those changes are kernel-only, transparent to user space. So excluding them as source for regression via older kvm-userspace should also be possible. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux