From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] qemu-kvm: other archs should maintain memory mapping
 also.
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 11:59:25 +0300
Message-ID: <49FEAE6D.9040708@redhat.com>
References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236A2BC03@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <49F6CED2.1060202@redhat.com> <49F86CED.3010101@sgi.com> <49FEAE3A.2070001@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>,
	"kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:60087 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751007AbZEDJAD (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 4 May 2009 05:00:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49FEAE3A.2070001@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> Hollis, does this work for you?
>>>
>>> If now, you can add a new define KVM_WANT_MAPPING or something, and 
>>> define it for I386 and IA64.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the one implementing the KVM_WANT_MAPPING change.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jes
>>
>>
>
> There is in fact a call to drop_mapping() outside any #ifdef (in 
> kvm_cpu_register_physical_memory()).  I'm confused... maybe we should 
> make this code unconditional.
>


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.