From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] don't start cpu main loop while there is still	init
 work to do.
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 17:33:26 +0300
Message-ID: <49FEFCB6.5070906@redhat.com>
References: <1241037101-24842-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1241037101-24842-2-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <49FEA7C2.7050908@redhat.com> <20090504142627.GG12844@poweredge.glommer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48078 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753692AbZEDOeA (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 4 May 2009 10:34:00 -0400
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n44EY1Q2012431
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 4 May 2009 10:34:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090504142627.GG12844@poweredge.glommer>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Glauber Costa wrote:
>> I'd like to avoid vcpu ioctls from more than one thread, in case we ever  
>> move to a syscall implementation.
>>     
>
> Although I don't see exactly what's your point in here.
> We're just adding a serialization points through pthreads function, not doing any ioctl from
> the outside.
>   

Doesn't the lapic creation call KVM_CREATE_LAPIC?

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.