From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Anthony DeRossi <ajderossi@gmail.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <abhsahu@nvidia.com>,
<yishaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] vfio/pci: Check the device set open count on reset
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:03:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b64e4b-43b9-ec7b-23d2-2fa1bf921046@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221110014027.28780-4-ajderossi@gmail.com>
Hi DeRossi,
On 2022/11/10 09:40, Anthony DeRossi wrote:
> vfio_pci_dev_set_needs_reset() inspects the open_count of every device
> in the set to determine whether a reset is allowed. The current device
> always has open_count == 1 within vfio_pci_core_disable(), effectively
> disabling the reset logic. This field is also documented as private in
> vfio_device, so it should not be used to determine whether other devices
> in the set are open.
haven't went through the prior version. maybe may question has been already
answered. My question is:
the major reason is the order problem in vfio_main.c. close_device() is
always called before decreasing open_count to be 0. So even other device
has no open fd, the current vfio_device still have one open count. So why
can't we just switch the order of open_count-- and close_device()?
> Checking for vfio_device_set_open_count() > 1 on the device set fixes
> both issues
tbh. it's weird to me that a driver needs to know the internal logic of
vfio core before knowing it needs to check the vfio_device_set_open_count()
in this way. Is vfio-pci the only driver that needs to do this check or
there are other drivers? If there are other drivers, maybe fixing the order
in core is better.
> After commit 2cd8b14aaa66 ("vfio/pci: Move to the device set
> infrastructure"), failure to create a new file for a device would cause
> the reset to be skipped due to open_count being decremented after
> calling close_device() in the error path.
>
> After commit eadd86f835c6 ("vfio: Remove calls to
> vfio_group_add_container_user()"), releasing a device would always skip
> the reset due to an ordering change in vfio_device_fops_release().
>
> Failing to reset the device leaves it in an unknown state, potentially
> causing errors when it is accessed later or bound to a different driver.
>
> This issue was observed with a Radeon RX Vega 56 [1002:687f] (rev c3)
> assigned to a Windows guest. After shutting down the guest, unbinding
> the device from vfio-pci, and binding the device to amdgpu:
>
> [ 548.007102] [drm:psp_hw_start [amdgpu]] *ERROR* PSP create ring failed!
> [ 548.027174] [drm:psp_hw_init [amdgpu]] *ERROR* PSP firmware loading failed
> [ 548.027242] [drm:amdgpu_device_fw_loading [amdgpu]] *ERROR* hw_init of IP block <psp> failed -22
> [ 548.027306] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: amdgpu_device_ip_init failed
> [ 548.027308] amdgpu 0000:0a:00.0: amdgpu: Fatal error during GPU init
>
> Fixes: 2cd8b14aaa66 ("vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure")
> Fixes: eadd86f835c6 ("vfio: Remove calls to vfio_group_add_container_user()")
> Signed-off-by: Anthony DeRossi <ajderossi@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index badc9d828cac..e030c2120183 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -2488,12 +2488,12 @@ static bool vfio_pci_dev_set_needs_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set)
> struct vfio_pci_core_device *cur;
> bool needs_reset = false;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(cur, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) {
> - /* No VFIO device in the set can have an open device FD */
> - if (cur->vdev.open_count)
> - return false;
> + /* No other VFIO device in the set can be open. */
> + if (vfio_device_set_open_count(dev_set) > 1)
> + return false;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(cur, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list)
> needs_reset |= cur->needs_reset;
> - }
> return needs_reset;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-10 1:40 [PATCH v6 0/3] vfio/pci: Check the device set open count on reset Anthony DeRossi
2022-11-10 1:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] vfio: Fix container device registration life cycle Anthony DeRossi
2022-11-10 2:36 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-10 1:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] vfio: Export the device set open count Anthony DeRossi
2022-11-10 2:46 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-10 1:40 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] vfio/pci: Check the device set open count on reset Anthony DeRossi
2022-11-10 3:03 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2022-11-10 4:17 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-10 4:33 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] " Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b64e4b-43b9-ec7b-23d2-2fa1bf921046@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=abhsahu@nvidia.com \
--cc=ajderossi@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox