From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Beth Kon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] BIOS changes for configuring irq0->inti2 override Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 18:35:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4A0210A8.7030205@us.ibm.com> References: <1241471352-1642-1-git-send-email-eak@us.ibm.com> <919A9099171C4C8DA5E9F653FEB82124@FSCPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov To: Sebastian Herbszt Return-path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:50661 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755357AbZEFWfD (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 18:35:03 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n46MWRaQ026433 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 16:32:27 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n46MZ4rE153352 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 16:35:04 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n46MZ2Zr029777 for ; Wed, 6 May 2009 16:35:03 -0600 In-Reply-To: <919A9099171C4C8DA5E9F653FEB82124@FSCPC> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > Beth Kon wrote: >> @@ -477,6 +480,7 @@ void wrmsr_smp(uint32_t index, uint64_t val) >> #define QEMU_CFG_SIGNATURE 0x00 >> #define QEMU_CFG_ID 0x01 >> #define QEMU_CFG_UUID 0x02 >> +#define QEMU_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE 0x0e > > Small thing to consider before you resubmit: > In his patch "read-additional-acpi-tables-from-a-vm.patch" Gleb > introduced: > > #define QEMU_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL 0x8000 > #define QEMU_CFG_ACPI_TABLES (QEMU_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL + 0) > > I think the idea behind this was to seperate the generic part from > arch specific. > The IRQ0 override seems to be arch specific (x86 only?) just like the > ACPI tables, right? I'm not sure what the intent is. It looks like it would be just for additional tables (as opposed to "local")? Gleb? I don't believe irq0 override would fall into that category. But in any case since this is not in any code base, I don't think there's anything to be done yet. > > - Sebastian > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html