From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [patch] fix qemu-kvm to build when gdbstub is disabled Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 13:38:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4A02C823.3070304@siemens.com> References: <4A01AFE8.3020008@sgi.com> <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236AC6F59@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4A02AA81.90809@redhat.com> <4A02BD27.5050401@siemens.com> <4A02BF59.6030103@redhat.com> <4A02C277.4000402@siemens.com> <4A02C5F1.4060205@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" , Jes Sorensen , "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , qemu-devel To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:21219 "EHLO lizzard.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753330AbZEGLik (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 07:38:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A02C5F1.4060205@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> I agree, unless >>> >>> - we want to make gdbstub support configurable (don't see any >>> overwhelming reason for this, but maybe others do) >>> - we want to merge ia64 kvm support upstream, and don't want to impose >>> gdbstub support (though I'd recommend properly implementing gdbstub) >>> >>> In any case, I'm okay with dropping the check upstream and applying the >>> local fixup. >>> >> >> The last ia64 tcg patch I saw one or two days ago was missing gdb >> support, too (and may suffer from some brokenness for that reason). > > I didn't see ia64/tcg. Did you mean s390? That was host only IIRC. Ah, you are right. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux