From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:37:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4A085464.5030802@goop.org> References: <4A0040C0.1080102@redhat.com> <4A0041BA.6060106@novell.com> <4A004676.4050604@redhat.com> <4A0049CD.3080003@gmail.com> <20090505231718.GT3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4A010927.6020207@novell.com> <20090506072212.GV3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4A018DF2.6010301@novell.com> <20090506160712.GW3036@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4A031471.7000406@novell.com> <20090507233503.GA9103@amt.cnet> <4A043E89.90403@novell.com> <4A044786.2080508@codemonkey.ws> <4A047EDE.2020806@redhat.com> <4A0481AC.7070409@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Gregory Haskins , Marcelo Tosatti , Chris Wright , Gregory Haskins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:33912 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753046AbZEKQh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 12:37:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A0481AC.7070409@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori wrote: > Yes, I misunderstood that they actually emulated it like that. > However, ia64 has no paravirtualization support today so surely, we > aren't going to be justifying this via ia64, right? > Someone is actively putting a pvops infrastructure into the ia64 port, along with a Xen port. I think pieces of it got merged this last window. J