public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Fischer, Anna" <anna.fischer@hp.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Network I/O performance
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:23:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0A7556.4070406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E66BBF927A9@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Fischer, Anna wrote:
> I am running KVM with Fedora Core 8 on a 2.6.23 32-bit kernel. I use the tun/tap device model and the Linux bridge kernel module to connect my VM to the network. I have 2 10G Intel 82598 network devices (with the ixgbe driver) attached to my machine and I want to do packet routing in my VM (the VM has two virtual network interfaces configured). Analysing the network performance of the standard QEMU emulated NICs, I get less that 1G of throughput on those 10G links. Surprisingly though, I don't really see CPU utilization being maxed out. This is a dual core machine, and mpstat shows me that both CPUs are about 40% idle. My VM is more or less unresponsive due to the high network processing load while the host OS still seems to be in good shape. How can I best tune this setup to achieve bes
 t possible performance with KVM? I know there is virtIO and I know there is PCI pass-through, but those models are not an option for me right now.
>   

How many cpus are assigned to the guest?  If only one, then 40% idle 
equates to 100% of a core for the guest and 20% for housekeeping.

If this is the case, you could try pinning the vcpu thread ("info cpus" 
from the monitor) to one core.  You should then see 100%/20% cpu load 
distribution.

wrt emulated NIC performance, I'm guessing you're not doing tcp?  If you 
were we might do something with TSO.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-13  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12  0:28 Network I/O performance Fischer, Anna
2009-05-13  7:23 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-05-13 15:56   ` Fischer, Anna
2009-05-17 21:14     ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19  1:30       ` Herbert Xu
2009-05-19  4:53         ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19  7:18       ` tun/tap and Vlans (was: Re: Network I/O performance) Lukas Kolbe
2009-05-19  7:45         ` tun/tap and Vlans Avi Kivity
2009-05-19 19:46           ` Lukas Kolbe
2009-05-20 10:25           ` Fischer, Anna
2009-05-20 10:38             ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19 21:22       ` Does KVM suffer from ACK-compression as you increase the number of VMs? Andrew de Andrade
2009-05-20 10:15       ` Network I/O performance Fischer, Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0A7556.4070406@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna.fischer@hp.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox