From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: virtual device as irq injection interface Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:04:29 +0300 Message-ID: <4A23C3CD.7060601@redhat.com> References: <20090531185841.GA10043@redhat.com> <4A22DD4B.8010703@redhat.com> <20090531201045.GA11327@redhat.com> <4A22E8F8.8020508@redhat.com> <20090601041804.GA4701@redhat.com> <4A23C2D1.4030402@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, Davide Libenzi To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41636 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752978AbZFAMEa (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:04:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A23C2D1.4030402@novell.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gregory Haskins wrote: > A potential compromise is to investigate the POLLHUP technique that > Davide mentioned so that kvmfd can get notified of the closure without > needing an additional explicit ioctl to do it. Note that we already > have irqfd in the tree so I assume we would need to do this in a ABI > friendly way, but its possible. > We don't have irqfd in any released tree. I'm only submitting it for 2.6.32 (exactly so we can iron these things out), so we can change it any way we like or even pull it out completely. The POLLHUP stuff is something I'd like to see in. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function