From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Haskins Subject: Re: [KVM-RFC PATCH 2/2] kvm: use POLLHUP to close an irqfd instead of an explicit ioctl Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:27:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4A26B284.3060809@novell.com> References: <20090602151135.29746.91320.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090602151538.29746.40356.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20090602180256.GD6743@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4A256E12.9060301@novell.com> <20090602220157.GF6743@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4A25D799.10604@novell.com> <20090603150439.GB6640@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig25CB41F09E6F3EA94C350FDF" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, davidel@xmailserver.org, mst@redhat.com To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090603150439.GB6640@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig25CB41F09E6F3EA94C350FDF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks again for the review, Paul. IIUC, you think the design is ok as it is. Davide, In light of this, would you like to submit patch 1/2 formally with your SOB at your earliest convenience? Or would you prefer that I submit it and you can simply ack it? Either is fine with me. -Greg --------------enig25CB41F09E6F3EA94C350FDF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkomsokACgkQlOSOBdgZUxlbYQCeKTTQYgdOxIStBPhF54zmgcTK kzEAmgOB5Fu09ghDYLgbVuZtuWMSy7bh =532n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig25CB41F09E6F3EA94C350FDF--