* KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE
@ 2009-06-04 7:20 Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gilles PIETRI @ 2009-06-04 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Hi,
I'm quite pissed off. I just upgraded to kvm-86 on a host that has
worked nicely on kvm-78 for quite some time. But since I was fearing the
qcow2 corruption issues, I wanted to upgrade kvm-86. After testing the
performance, I decided to switch. How stupid that was. That was really
putting too much trust in KVM.
Now I can't have 64 bits CPUs on my guests.
My host is running a 2.6.27.7 kernel, and is x86_64 enabled.
Until the upgrade, guests were running x86_64 fine.
Now, it says long mode can't be used or something like that, and I can
only have 32 bits guests.
Looks really like the bug explained here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg09431.html
If I use -no-kvm, it works, but obviously, I want to be able to have kvm
support enabled.
Now, I really am happy about this upgrade, and I'm gonna have to roll it
back. I really would appreciate some help on this..
Gilles
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE
2009-06-04 7:20 KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE Gilles PIETRI
@ 2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
2009-06-04 8:02 ` Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 8:00 ` Alexey Eromenko
2009-06-04 9:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jim Paris @ 2009-06-04 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles PIETRI; +Cc: kvm
Gilles PIETRI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm quite pissed off. I just upgraded to kvm-86 on a host that has
> worked nicely on kvm-78 for quite some time. But since I was fearing the
> qcow2 corruption issues, I wanted to upgrade kvm-86. After testing the
> performance, I decided to switch. How stupid that was. That was really
> putting too much trust in KVM.
>
> Now I can't have 64 bits CPUs on my guests.
> My host is running a 2.6.27.7 kernel, and is x86_64 enabled.
> Until the upgrade, guests were running x86_64 fine.
> Now, it says long mode can't be used or something like that, and I can
> only have 32 bits guests.
Please see
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg15757.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg15769.html
-jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE
2009-06-04 7:20 KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
@ 2009-06-04 8:00 ` Alexey Eromenko
2009-06-04 9:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Eromenko @ 2009-06-04 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
----- "Gilles PIETRI" <contact+dev@gilouweb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm quite pissed off. I just upgraded to kvm-86 on a host that has
> worked nicely on kvm-78 for quite some time. But since I was fearing
> the
> qcow2 corruption issues, I wanted to upgrade kvm-86. After testing the
>
> performance, I decided to switch. How stupid that was. That was really
>
> putting too much trust in KVM.
>
> Now I can't have 64 bits CPUs on my guests.
> My host is running a 2.6.27.7 kernel, and is x86_64 enabled.
> Until the upgrade, guests were running x86_64 fine.
> Now, it says long mode can't be used or something like that, and I can
>
> only have 32 bits guests.
>
> Looks really like the bug explained here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg09431.html
>
> If I use -no-kvm, it works, but obviously, I want to be able to have
> kvm
> support enabled.
>
> Now, I really am happy about this upgrade, and I'm gonna have to roll
> it
> back. I really would appreciate some help on this..
>
> Gilles
Hi Gilles,
What are you saying is very strange, because KVM-Autotest has passed all tests for KVM-86 release,
and I can say that 64-bit guests work here. (both Intel & AMD, on RHEL 5.3/x64)
-Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE
2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
@ 2009-06-04 8:02 ` Gilles PIETRI
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gilles PIETRI @ 2009-06-04 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Paris; +Cc: kvm
Le 04/06/2009 09:46, Jim Paris a écrit :
> Gilles PIETRI wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm quite pissed off. I just upgraded to kvm-86 on a host that has
>> worked nicely on kvm-78 for quite some time. But since I was fearing the
>> qcow2 corruption issues, I wanted to upgrade kvm-86. After testing the
>> performance, I decided to switch. How stupid that was. That was really
>> putting too much trust in KVM.
>>
>> Now I can't have 64 bits CPUs on my guests.
>> My host is running a 2.6.27.7 kernel, and is x86_64 enabled.
>> Until the upgrade, guests were running x86_64 fine.
>> Now, it says long mode can't be used or something like that, and I can
>> only have 32 bits guests.
>
> Please see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg15757.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg15769.html
>
> -jim
Gonna check that, thanks a lot, this didn't get on my radar..
Regards,
Gilles
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE
2009-06-04 7:20 KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
2009-06-04 8:00 ` Alexey Eromenko
@ 2009-06-04 9:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark McLoughlin @ 2009-06-04 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles PIETRI; +Cc: kvm
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 09:20 +0200, Gilles PIETRI wrote:
> I'm quite pissed off. I just upgraded to kvm-86 on a host that has
> worked nicely on kvm-78 for quite some time. But since I was fearing the
> qcow2 corruption issues, I wanted to upgrade kvm-86. After testing the
> performance, I decided to switch. How stupid that was. That was really
> putting too much trust in KVM.
Jim has already responded with details on the first for the particular
issue, but speaking more generally ...
The kvm-XX releases are snapshots of the development tree. They do not
go to through the kind of stabilisation cycle you would expect from a
new kernel release, for example.
If you want a KVM version you can trust, use the latest qemu-kvm-0.x.y
release with the stock version of kvm.ko that comes with your kernel or,
if you need particular new features, the latest kvm-kmod-2.6.z release.
Cheers,
Mark.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-04 9:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-04 7:20 KVM-86 not exposing 64 bits CPU anymore, NICE Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 7:46 ` Jim Paris
2009-06-04 8:02 ` Gilles PIETRI
2009-06-04 8:00 ` Alexey Eromenko
2009-06-04 9:27 ` Mark McLoughlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox